Showing posts with label the oppressed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the oppressed. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 02, 2013

POWER AND TRANSFORMATION


16th December 2012 : Advent 3 : Year C
8:00am and 9:30am Kalamunda
Zephaniah 3:14-20 : Song of Isaiah : Philippians 4:4-7 : Luke 3:7-18

The third Sunday of Advent. It’s often seen as a bit of a “resting place” after the first couple of soul-searching Sundays, and in some parts of the tradition a rose (read “pink”) candle is lit as part of the Advent wreath liturgy. Some communities of faith even sport rose vestments.

The readings reflect this change of pace. Suddenly we’re all joy and celebration – and that’s not a problem, except for the desire to turn Advent into what some liturgists call a “mini Lent”. This Sunday, in that way of thinking, is the vague equivalent of Lent’s Laudate Sunday, when the faithful have a break from the spiritual self-flagellation of the previous weeks.

But Advent is not a mini Lent; and what we engage today is not so much a “breather” from the demands of the previous Sundays but a recognition that the Awaited and Anticipated are approaching quickly now. It’s a kind of rehearsal for the letting-go of Christmass, the wholehearted celebration of Jesus’ birth.

Even so, it’s wise to ask what we are celebrating here on this third Sunday because the cause of the joy is by no means as clear as a rather shallow and cursory glance might indicate. 

For instance, to say that we’re getting on the joy because we have a whiff of the so-called “reason for the season” is somewhat facile, though perhaps not entirely so. Such a view buys a controlling interest in the hoary conceit of cause-and-affect: celebrate Jesus’ birth, sing upbeat carols and hymns, exchange gifts and greetings.

Surely – and we should add if only because the Living God is involved in this – the presence of prophets is alone enough to indicate that we are living through something far more profound that cause-and-effect – something that actually involves transformation and not just the puppet-on-a-string mentality that cause-and-effect thinking implies.

In other words, what is happening is change. The cause-and-effect mindset requires nothing more than blind, mute subservience to whatever wind of doctrine, as it were, happens to blow us along said doctrine’s predefined pathway.

Transformation, on the other hand, demands the change implicit in turning back to the Living God. That’s what God, through the prophets and through Jesus, calls us to do. Transformation is what God does in loving, gracious response to our return.

The joy that our readings speak of, therefore, is the recognition of God’s “breaking in” to our damaged and damaging human world and making inroads into the terrorising perversion of power that humankind practises. It’s the joy born of knowing that our world of horror and injustice, oppression and marginalisation is being shown not simply a better way but the only good way of being.

Therefore the prophet Zephaniah records God’s forthright promises:

I will deal with all your oppressors at that time. And I will save the lame and gather the outcast, and I will change their shame into praise and renown in all the earth.

This is where and how God acts: in presence with and concern for the weakest and most impoverished among us.

And make no mistake – this is not some namby-pamby, sentimentalist, socialist/communist/do-gooder rubbish. This is the Living God’s concern, articulated again and again in the Hebrew scriptures, and put poignantly and uncompromisingly into practice in the person and work of Jesus of Nazareth.

We ignore this at our peril.

When John the baptiser jeers at the mob on Jordon’s banks coming for baptism thinking, perhaps, that they will just be going through the motions, participating bodily in another ritual, but one that will formalise whatever their conception of salvation might be, he’s ironically describing the world situation that misuses and perverts power. “You brood of vipers!” says he. Such an evocative phrase! And so accurate an image of the repulsive lust for power that finds greater traction in game-playing, and prodding and poking the rival than in using the same energy to do God’s will.

How great would the Church or any parish or worshipping community be if its energies came to bear, in concert, on God’s will, on seeking the oppressed, and being kind, loving, compassionate and forgiving towards the people on the edge!

But the image at the conclusion of the passage is also worth exploring. I’ll reproduce my research at this point because it’s clear and to-the-point, and any paraphrase is likely to do the insight damage and disservice. It comes from Sarah Dylan Bauer’s blog, Sarah Laughed. She is referring to the passage that reads: his winnowing fork is in his hand…

A winnowing fork is used to separate the wheat from the chaff. A winnowing shovel is what you use after someone else has done their work with the fork and the wheat and chaff are already separated to do what John says the coming one will do: "gather the wheat into his granary," while "the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire." Jesus is only fulfilling half of what John says the mighty one coming would do: he's baptising with the Holy Spirit and gathering people for healing, good news, and blessing, but the fire to destroy the wicked is nowhere to be seen.[1]

She goes on to say that later, when John is in prison and questioning whether Jesus is “the one who is to come”,

John is invited to rejoice at what God is doing in the world, and to let go of what God is not doing, to release his preconceptions and take in the reality of God's presence and work.[2]

We are in exactly the same place. We, like John, need to let go of preconceived notions and open our eyes and ears to the reality of what God IS ACTUALLY DOING in our community.

As to the fire that will destroy the wicked, which is “nowhere to be seen” – it is not Jesus who will wield this fire. That’s why the fire is never apparent. The shocking reality is that it is the twisters and perverters of power who use the fire to destroy one another. They practise destruction upon themselves by preferring their power games and needling and jockeying for position, often over trivial and petty issues, investing them with the kind of importance one might accord to worshipping the Living God or sitting down next to a homeless youth and finding out who they are and what they need.

This kind of behaviour fools very few people. It’s naked, secular power strutting and parading under the huffing and puffing guise of self-importance. It’s fire burning up chaff. But it does NOT come from God.

God’s will is for transformation in its broadest sense. It’s where our search for revelation intersects with God’s yearning for connection. Is that smoke I can smell? Or is it a barbecue for the hungry and homeless…?

Monday, September 10, 2007

THE CROSS: BEYOND NARCISSISM




9th September 2007 : Pentecost 15 : Year C
9:30am Westfield
Jeremiah 18:1-11 Philemon 1-25 : Luke 14:25-35




Narcissism is a term first used in relation to human thought and behavior by the
Austrian physician and psychiatrist
Sigmund Freud.




Narcissism is a set of character traits concerned with self-admiration, self-centeredness and self-regard. Everyone has some narcissistic traits. However, narcissism can also manifest in an extreme pathological form in some personality disorders such as Narcissistic Personality Disorder wherein the patient overestimates his abilities and has an excessive need for admiration and affirmation. This may be present to such a degree that it severely damages the person's ability to live a productive or happy life because the traits manifest as severe selfishness and disregard for the needs and feelings of others.[†]

That’s a quotation from Wikipedia[‡‡] , the “free online encyclopaedia”, and the reason I’ve begun with the topic of narcissism is because I suspect it’s one of the factors that contribute to my discomfort at this gospel passage.

Don’t get me wrong, this isn’t a confession that I have Narcissistic Personal Disorder. At least, I don’t think I have it! But part of my discomfort here does come from taking this passage at an entirely personal level.

Again, don’t get me wrong. We ARE meant to take this very personally indeed. This IS about the personal cost of following Jesus and Jesus wants us to be absolutely clear about the implications of being one of his followers.

It requires commitment – wholehearted, full-bodied, lifetime commitment. It’s not something we might decide to do as a whim, thinking we’ll just pull out, drift away, fade into the sunset of the next appealing spiritual fancy that comes along.

We know Jesus is serious about this because he uses some pretty uncompromising language, talking for instance about hating our families. As Jesus did earlier in Luke, he boldly assaults one of the foundations of Judaism in telling us to HATE our father, mother, wife, children, brothers, sisters.

These days we might retreat to the perverse comfort of some throwaway line about how “dysfunctional” our family is but back then it was mighty challenging stuff. Because Jesus actually does say HATE. Not “dislike” or “feel mildly ticked-off every now and then” – but HATE.

As in “Nazis hate Jews, among others”. As in “most people who live with the delusion of normality hate paedophiles”. As in that disastrously unchristian Christian web site, “God hates fags”.

It’s a pretty good attention-grabber. …Talk about getting you round the throat in a vice-like grip!

And no, Jesus isn’t advising us to respond literally. But he is making a crucial – pardon the pun – point. He does want us to be clear that becoming one of his followers is the most serious commitment we will ever make and that it lasts a lifetime.

So he’s saying, Be absolutely sure what you’re doing. In the gospel words: “count the cost”. Yes, I AM asking you to choose between family and me; I AM demanding your undivided attention AND commitment; I AM telling you that this isn’t just a pastime, a phase, something to do when you feel bored or terrified or there’s nothing worth watching on the telly.

And all of that fundamentally disturbs the wee narcissist lurking, I suspect, in all of us. It certainly challenges me at two narcissistic levels: first because it demands that I think clearly, concisely and consciously about someone other than moi (despite today’s continuing obsession with the “most important person in the world – [ME]”); and second, because Jesus’ challenge makes me think that “taking up the cross” is something that ONLY affects me.

I’ve begun reading a book by Kent Ira Groff, Active spirituality: a guide for seekers and ministers. In the introduction Groff tells a story about a parishioner and his pastor, both of whom felt spiritual dry. So dry that they were unable to see the possibility of helping each other through that terrifying experience.

Groff makes the comment, sadly but without judgement, that neither was able to bring their burdens to the cross and lay them down for healing.

It got me thinking. It began to remind me of one of the late scenes in the movie Kingdom of heaven, in which the most arrogant of the Crusaders march to their doom. They leave Jerusalem boldly parading what was historically regarded as the True Cross, garishly decorated in plated gold, glinting at the desert sun, the symbol, ultimately of their folly and greed. Cut to the aftermath of the battle and we see the same cross, in the background, surrounded by the dead bodies of its erstwhile defenders, stripped of its finery but still standing – standing in the midst of pain and suffering, human misery piled high around it.

The irony and the paradox of that scene remains. The cross that stands in the midst of pain and suffering – the very symbol in our faith of pain and suffering – is EXACTLY where it should be. It is EXACTLY what it should be – the place where all who suffer come for hope and healing.

And when Jesus tells us to take up the cross he is doing so in the knowledge that if we truly hold HIS cross then those who suffer, those who are lost, the weak, the impoverished, the oppressed – will come to it sooner or later. It is and will continue to be, for them, the hope they need, the hope they crave, the hope for which they might not even know they yearn.

Are we who claim to be Jesus’ followers, cross-carriers, prepared to encounter and assist those kind of people? The lost, the broken, the damaged … Are we prepared to recognise and admit that we ourselves are among them? Are we willing to love the kind of people – society’s flotsam and jetsam – who inhabit places like the caravan park across the road?

Because that is what will happen if we really ARE carrying Jesus’ cross. That is what will happen if we really ARE being Jesus.

So the challenge is only partly about me and my response to the cross and the demands such a personal response might make. It’s also about being prepared to stand in the midst of suffering because THAT is the place where the cross of Jesus stands.

Let’s continue, then, to reflect on these twin challenges. Are we in the Parish of the Holy Spirit, Westfield, prepared to make a wholehearted – body, mind, soul and strength – commitment to Jesus? and are we willing to receive and accept those who come to his cross seeking hope and healing?



Alistair Bain, Priest-in-Charge, Westfield



[†] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_personality_disorder and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_disorder.
[‡‡] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page